Last Tuesday, I found myself stuck in bumper-to-bumper traffic on the M25, desperately trying to turn down the blaring air conditioning in my colleague’s Volkswagen ID.3. As I jabbed repeatedly at the unresponsive haptic slider, accidentally cranking the volume to maximum instead, my friend James just laughed. “Welcome to the future,” he said. “Isn’t it great?”
That frustrating moment – one familiar to countless VW owners – is now officially recognized as a design failure by the German automaker itself. In a remarkable admission that has sent ripples through the automotive design world, Volkswagen has publicly declared its haptic touch controls “a mistake” and vowed to bring back physical buttons across its vehicle lineup.
For those of us who’ve spent years fumbling with unresponsive touch sliders and buried touchscreen menus while trying to keep our eyes on the road, this announcement feels like vindication. But it also represents something far more significant: a pivotal moment in car interior design that could influence the entire industry for years to come.
The Admission That Shocked the Industry
During a recent roundtable with automotive journalists, Thomas Schäfer, CEO of Volkswagen Passenger Cars, made the stunning confession that has car enthusiasts cheering worldwide.
“The haptic controls on the steering wheel – that was a mistake,” Schäfer stated frankly, adding that the company is now “making a clear commitment to physical buttons” going forward.
I was actually in Wolfsburg last month for an unrelated press event when rumors of this shift first began circulating among VW employees. Over beers at a local pub, an interior designer who requested anonymity (understandably, given the sensitivity of the topic) confided that internal satisfaction scores for their touch-based interfaces had been “absolutely dismal” for years.
“We knew it wasn’t working,” he told me, nursing his Krombacher while glancing nervously around the room. “But there was this belief that customers would eventually adapt, that this was the inevitable future. It took new leadership to finally admit what many of us have been saying behind closed doors.”
This candid admission marks a dramatic reversal from Volkswagen’s previous steadfast commitment to touch-based interfaces and minimalist, screen-dominated interiors. The company had been gradually eliminating physical controls since around 2019, when the eighth-generation Golf debuted with its controversial touch-sensitive dashboard and steering wheel controls.
A Brief History of Volkswagen’s Touch Obsession
To understand why this reversal is so significant, we need to look back at how Volkswagen found itself down this haptic rabbit hole in the first place.
The shift began in earnest with the Mk8 Golf, which eliminated many of the physical buttons and knobs that had characterized previous generations. Even basic functions like headlights were converted to touch-sensitive sliders, while the central infotainment system absorbed climate controls into its digital interface.
I still remember the launch event in Lisbon, where Volkswagen representatives proudly showcased the “sleek, modern aesthetic” of the new touch-dominated interior. When one journalist raised concerns about usability while driving, the product specialist dismissed them with a wave: “This is the future. Customers want minimalist, clean interiors like their smartphones.”
The problems were evident almost immediately in early reviews, but Volkswagen doubled down on the approach. The ID.3 and ID.4 electric vehicles pushed the concept even further, featuring an almost button-free environment with critical functions buried within touchscreen menus.
My friend Sarah, who traded her beloved Golf GTI for an ID.3 in 2021, summed up the ownership experience perfectly during our Sunday walk last weekend: “I love almost everything about the car except the one thing I interact with constantly. I literally have to pull over to adjust the climate control safely. How did anyone think this was a good idea?”
The Real-World Consequences
The problems with haptic and touch controls extend far beyond mere inconvenience. Multiple studies have demonstrated significant safety concerns associated with touchscreen-dependent interfaces.
A 2022 study by the Transport Research Laboratory found that drivers took up to four times longer to perform basic tasks using touchscreens compared to physical controls, with their eyes off the road for dangerously extended periods. Another study by Sweden’s VTI transport research institute showed that adjusting climate controls on a touchscreen was comparable to reading a text message in terms of driver distraction.
I experienced this firsthand last summer while testing an ID.4 on a rainy highway drive to Cornwall. A sudden temperature drop had fogged up the windscreen, and I needed to redirect air flow immediately. What should have been an instant adjustment with a physical button became a dangerous multi-step process: wake the screen, find the climate menu, locate the right submenu, then precisely tap the correct icon – all while trying to maintain visibility and control of the vehicle.
“It was never about what customers wanted,” automotive ergonomics specialist Dr. Helena Wright told me during an interview for this article. “It was about what looked futuristic in marketing materials and showrooms. The disconnect between how these interfaces photographed versus how they functioned in daily driving scenarios was enormous.”
This disconnect has increasingly shown up in customer satisfaction surveys. J.D. Power’s Initial Quality Study has shown rising complaints about infotainment and control systems across brands that have aggressively pursued touch-based interfaces, with Volkswagen’s rankings suffering notably in recent years.
The Tesla Effect
No discussion of automotive touch controls would be complete without addressing the Tesla-shaped elephant in the room.
Much of the industry’s rush toward minimalist, screen-dominated interiors can be traced directly to Tesla’s influence, particularly the Model 3’s ultra-minimalist dashboard featuring little more than a steering wheel and a large central screen.
“Tesla created this design language that became shorthand for ‘modern’ and ‘tech-forward,'” explained automotive design critic Marcus Simmons over coffee last week. “Suddenly, physical buttons looked outdated to executives, regardless of how well they actually worked.”
The irony, as Simmons pointed out while absentmindedly stirring his now-cold americano, is that Tesla’s approach was driven as much by manufacturing simplicity and cost-cutting as it was by aesthetic considerations. “Fewer physical components means lower production costs and fewer potential failure points. Traditional automakers copied the look without fully understanding the business logic behind it.”
This Tesla-inspired approach spread rapidly throughout the industry, with brands from Audi to Volvo eliminating physical controls in favor of touchscreens. But while Tesla owners largely adapted to the paradigm – having chosen the brand specifically for its tech-forward approach – traditional automakers found their existing customers far less accommodating.
What Volkswagen’s Decision Means for the Industry
When a manufacturer as influential as Volkswagen publicly reverses course on a major design trend, the repercussions inevitably extend beyond its own product line.
“Volkswagen isn’t just any automaker,” industry analyst Sophia Chen explained during our phone conversation yesterday. “They’re a bellwether for mainstream design trends, particularly in Europe. Their admission that touch controls were a mistake gives other manufacturers permission to step back from the touchscreen abyss.”
Already, there are signs that other brands are reconsidering their interior design strategies. During a recent studio tour that I can’t name due to embargo agreements, I noticed clay models for upcoming vehicles from a major German competitor featuring noticeably more physical controls than their current production models.
“Everyone’s been watching customer satisfaction scores and warranty claims related to these interfaces,” a senior executive at a rival European brand told me at the Geneva Motor Show, speaking on condition of anonymity. “The data hasn’t supported the design direction, but there’s been a reluctance to be the first to blink. Now that Volkswagen has made the move, expect others to follow.”
This potential industry-wide reversal highlights an important truth: car interiors aren’t smartphones. The requirements for safely controlling a vehicle moving at speed are fundamentally different from interacting with a stationary device that commands your full attention.
The Financial Reality
Beyond the safety and user experience concerns, there’s a cold financial reality driving Volkswagen’s decision. Poor reception of their touch interfaces has impacted both sales and brand perception.
“We’ve lost customers over this,” admitted a Volkswagen dealer in Manchester who I’ve known for years through local car events. “I’ve had loyal VW buyers of 20+ years walk away after test drives because they couldn’t stand the controls. When people are choosing a Kia or Hyundai over your product specifically because of the interface, you know you’ve made a serious misstep.”
The financial impact extends beyond lost sales. Warranty claims and service visits related to unresponsive touch controls have increased substantially, according to three separate VW service managers I spoke with across the UK. Software updates to address touch sensitivity issues have become a common service item, creating both direct costs and customer frustration.
The timing of Volkswagen’s announcement also coincides with broader financial challenges for the company, which has struggled with software development across its new generation of vehicles. The complexity of creating intuitive, responsive touch interfaces has proven far more difficult than the physical buttons they replaced.
What Comes Next: The New Interior Philosophy
So what will Volkswagen’s return to physical controls actually look like? According to sources within the company and early concept images I’ve been shown (but can’t reproduce here due to confidentiality agreements), the answer isn’t simply turning back the clock to pre-2019 designs.
Instead, Volkswagen appears to be developing a hybrid approach that maintains the clean aesthetic of modern interiors while restoring physical controls for critical functions. Early mockups show a new steering wheel design with proper buttons rather than haptic touch points, alongside physical climate controls that can be operated by feel.
“The goal isn’t to abandon digital interfaces entirely,” explained Dr. Werner Schmidt, a human-machine interface specialist formerly with Volkswagen Group, during our lengthy video call last Thursday. “It’s about finding the right balance between digital flexibility and physical immediacy. Some functions benefit from digital interfaces; others absolutely require tactile feedback and muscle memory.”
This new philosophy will likely debut with the refreshed ID.3, scheduled for next year, before rolling out across the lineup. The upcoming ID.7 sedan will reportedly feature this revised approach to interior controls, with development teams working to modify the already-finalized design to incorporate more physical elements before production.
The Broader Implications for Car Design
Volkswagen’s reversal signals something more fundamental than just a return to buttons. It represents a potential shift in how automakers approach the relationship between technology, design, and user experience.
For nearly a decade, the prevailing wisdom in automotive design has prioritized the appearance of technological sophistication over functional usability. The minimalist, screen-dominant aesthetic became a visual shorthand for “advanced,” regardless of whether it actually improved the driving experience.
“There’s been this fundamental confusion between what looks advanced in a static environment versus what functions well in a dynamic environment,” automotive psychologist Dr. Rebecca Torres explained when I interviewed her for this piece. “A sleek, button-free dashboard photographs beautifully and impresses in the showroom. But that same interface becomes problematic when you’re driving at 70mph in heavy rain.”
This tension between static impression and dynamic usability has plagued automotive interface design for years. Volkswagen’s acknowledgment of the problem could herald a new era where functional considerations regain primacy in the design process.
The Driver-Centered Future
What might this new, more balanced approach to car interiors look like across the industry? Several manufacturers offer potential previews.
Mazda has long maintained a driver-focused philosophy that preserves physical controls for critical functions while still incorporating digital displays. Their approach of positioning screens higher in the visual field to minimize eye movement, while retaining tactile controls for frequent interactions, has earned praise from ergonomics experts and customers alike.
Similarly, BMW’s iDrive system has evolved to incorporate both touch functionality and physical controls, with their rotary controller providing an interface that can be operated without looking away from the road. Even Toyota, with its latest infotainment systems, has carefully maintained physical climate controls alongside improved touchscreens.
During the Detroit Auto Show last month, I had the opportunity to interview a senior designer at a Japanese manufacturer (who requested anonymity due to the competitive nature of the topic). “We’ve been quietly satisfied watching our European competitors stumble with these over-digitized interiors,” she confided with a slight smile. “Our internal design philosophy never abandoned the primacy of the driving task. Every control element is evaluated based on how it performs while the vehicle is in motion, not just how it looks in static situations.”
This focus on dynamic usability rather than static impression could become the new paradigm for interior design as more manufacturers follow Volkswagen’s lead in reconsidering their approach to controls.
The Consumer Perspective
For consumers, Volkswagen’s return to physical buttons represents a rare victory of user feedback over design trends. It’s unusual for major manufacturers to so publicly acknowledge a misstep, particularly one that has defined their design language for several years.
“I feel validated,” laughed Michael Preston, a VW Golf owner I met at a cars and coffee event in Bristol last month, who had modified his Mk8 with aftermarket physical button solutions. “I’ve been complaining about these touch controls since the day I bought the car. It’s nice to know the company was eventually listening.”
This sentiment is echoed across owner forums and social media, where the announcement has been met with overwhelming approval. A quick poll I conducted on my automotive Instagram account showed 94% of respondents favoring the return to physical controls, with many citing safety concerns as their primary motivation.
Consumer advocacy groups have also welcomed the news. “This is a significant step toward prioritizing safety over style,” noted the spokesman for a major UK road safety organization when I reached out for comment. “We’ve been raising concerns about touchscreen distraction for years. Volkswagen’s decision validates those concerns and will hopefully influence safety standards across the industry.”
A Turning Point for Automotive Design
As I write this from my home office, glancing occasionally at my driveway where my own car sits – a 2018 model with a healthy mix of physical controls and digital displays – I can’t help but feel we’re witnessing a significant inflection point in automotive interior design.
Volkswagen’s admission that haptic controls were a mistake isn’t just about buttons versus touch surfaces. It’s about a fundamental reconsideration of how humans and machines interact in the unique context of driving. It’s about recognizing that technological advancement doesn’t always mean eliminating physical interfaces, but rather finding the optimal balance between digital capability and human factors.
The touch-obsessed era of automotive design isn’t ending entirely – digital interfaces still offer flexibility and features that physical buttons cannot match. But the pendulum that had swung so far toward minimalist, screen-dominated interiors is now swinging back toward a more balanced, human-centered approach.
For drivers who have spent years fumbling with unresponsive touch sliders and buried climate controls, Volkswagen’s announcement offers hope that the cars of tomorrow might combine the best of both worlds: the clean aesthetics and digital capabilities of modern design with the intuitive usability and safety of physical controls.
As my old driving instructor used to say, sometimes progress means knowing when to put your hands back on the wheel – or in this case, on actual buttons that you can feel without looking away from the road ahead.
Also Read –
Lexus Prepares For Expanded Electric Vehicle Launches In The Coming Years